Talk:Hair

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.
human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject Animals
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMammals High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAnthropology High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Article scope

What is this article actually about? It has: 1) content about the anatomy and physiology of hairs (hair follicles and all the rest), 2) a bit of content on the function of hair assemblages in mammals, and then 3) a lot of content on the practical and cultural aspects of that stuff humans have on their heads. Combining #1 and #2 in a single article makes sense (though why is that content also present in Fur?). But joining #1 with #3? The only justification I can see is the fact that both are referred to by the same English word, and that's as lousy a justification as it can get. – Uanfala (talk) 11:09, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Rambut" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Rambut and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 24#Rambut until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Plantdrew (talk) 16:56, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Add section on hearing

It's crazy that there isn't even a link to hair cells or any discussion of hair's role in hearing. Dgisser (talk) 05:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Rhetorical Practices from the Ancient World to Enlightenment

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2024 and 30 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Karinakathy05 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Karinakathy05 (talk) 17:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fia hairtype system

"Fia" isn't an acronym, it's the user ID of Annsofie Henriksen (sp?) at Long Hair Community, and should not be written in all caps. phma (talk) 10:20, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]