This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Happy Feet is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.
Request about merchandise
I want to put on that Persil gave away hatching Penguins as part of a Happy Feet promotion I just wanted to make sure it was ok with alot of other wikipedia users. User Jonny Armstrong 28/12/2011 17:19 GMT.
Location of the zoo aquarium
Under Plot, the fifth paragraph has "He is eventually washed up on the shore of Australia..."
However, the scene in question shows a zoom-out of Florida (United States), which is nowhere near Australia. Brichards85 (talk) 07:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Trev
Does anyone know which of the elephant seals was Trev? I think he was the one who first mentioned the "fun food" stuff. Visokor (talk) 10:10, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extra details in the dedication statement
The fact that the film is dedicated to Nick Enright, Michael Jonson, Robby McNeilly Green, and Steve Irwin is factual data about this film as the dedication statement is part of the film's presentation. Details beyond that that have nothing to do with this film are not appropriate. If sourced and not an
WP:original research conclusion, details that explain the reason for the dedication may be appropriate. What is specifically not appropriate is details about the death of Steve Irwin which has nothing to do with what happened on the film unless that can be shown, by references, to be the actual reason for the dedication. More likely the reason for the dedication is because Irwin worked on the film, not because of how he died. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
That this film was Irwin's final film has nothing to do with this film unless something happened when filming that caused that to happen otherwise it is just a coincidence. Irwin's article is linked for people interested in his life, death, and filmography and the fact that this film is the last film entry of the four in his filmography will be apparent when reading his bio article. The random trivia that Enright worked with Miller in the past implies that is the reason for the dedication. That would need to be stated explicitly and sourced if that were the actual reason. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]