User talk:Visokor

Hello, Visokor. You have new messages at DBigXray's talk page.
Message added 13:17, 12 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

DBigXray 13:17, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To install WP:Twinkle follow these steps

1. goto Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets and select Twinkle. (Don't forget to click "Save" at the bottom of the list of gadgets!)
2. After installing, make sure to
   bypass your browser cache
   .

You can read more about twinkle here on WP:Twinkle. it will give you an option of good faith revert as every edit is not vandalism. Try to do it yourself. You can ask me if you face any problem. cheers. --DBigXray 11:05, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i have to returned to help again.

i can see lots of bother have been happening on tom and jerry pages.

whan i was haveing a break.

i will now help out at times. however like i have in me own page. i won,t be overdoing things from now on.

i want ask you don,t send me message about bother ip on tom and jerry. i will keep a check on them and help out. but not overworking on them. its so i won,t need a rest again from overdoing things like i was.

--Iniced (talk) 16:43, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to add the plots and any other information, thought I'd help out by starting the remaining ones.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:03, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. However, may I say that all symphonies after Bugs in Love were in Technicolor, not black and white? Might I suggest correcting this? Visokor (talk) 11:08, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I stand corrected. Thanks! Would be good to also get some other information into them and sources.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:16, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see the vandalism in the article "

Hello, Visokor. You have new messages at DBigXray's talk page.
Message added 21:35, 3 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

After giving several warnings and talk page messages I have reported the WP:Disruptive editing editings of the IP ‎68.45.241.10 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, He is now blocked. DBigXray 21:35, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

...

The article Birds of a Feather (1931 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not Notable. See Wikipedia:Notability#Self-promotion_and_indiscriminate_publicity. Also: No reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wallace & Gromit's Musical Marvels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clair de Lune (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen the movie, so I wouldn't want to add something like that. The article doesn't appear to be locked, so you should be able to make the edit if you like. Trivialist (talk) 07:47, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shaun the Sheep, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Shining (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Primeval episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don't Stop Movin' (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Sword in the Stone (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dark Ages (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please, do not

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do not

Hello, Visokor. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Donald's Double Trouble, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 04:25, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article is an all-plot stub with no references, no indications of the subject's notability, and no links leading to it. After a month in the Wiki, the article needs to be cleaned up or removed. If you have content to add to the article, please add it! -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 04:28, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Book Revue may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• and the books come alive. The cartoon's first lampoon and pun appears, a book collection called ''"[[COMPLETE WORKS of [[Shakespeare]]"''. Shakespeare is shown in silhouette while his literally-

Thanks,

My concern about the Nika Futterman‎‎ article was your edit summary ("I think she provides Mizrabel's voice in the remake of Castle of Illusion"); you shouldn't be adding things to articles if you're not sure about them. :) Trivialist (talk) 12:07, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant to say was that she does voice her in the remake, but I'm not sure if anyone else would know... Visokor (talk) 12:33, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure there's anything I can do to the article -- it's mostly empty as it is, and I know very little about the show. Trivialist (talk) 11:35, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Visokor, i've just updated the games table with more UC names (can't do all yet because certain games have not appeared in UC). I started the Phase One table in my sandbox (it took my ages!) feel free to do the same for #2 but let me know first, i will probably make one in the coming weeks if you don't. Not much i can do about sorting the table A-Z because of the text in brackets. Thanks for your help in the recent months. Much appreciated, Fort_esc (talk) 15:36, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the tags I've placed on your latest article and take appropriate action to bring it up to standard. Deb (talk) 11:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are using present tense, when you should use future tense. Can you please change this? Thanks if you can! :) HumorousZR (talk) 01:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a note to let the main editors of

BAFTAs, and eventually garnered respect as a classic from viewers of all ages. (Full article...

)

talk) 23:02, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bugs Bunny's 3rd Movie: 1001 Rabbit Tales may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''[[One Froggy Evening]]'' (the scenes set in the future are not shown

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

talk) 13:38, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Tree for Two

No problem. Since there are already so many articles about Warner Bros. shorts, probably the easiest way to start is by using an article about another short as a base, and replacing the facts with info about Tree for Two. (Also, I'd suggest calling it

Tree for Two instead of "Tree For Two.") Trivialist (talk) 17:25, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

You can expand the plot if you want, but keep in mind that it's only a 6-7 minute short, so it doesn't have to be very long. Trivialist (talk) 18:22, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About your edit on Frozen (2013 film)

reliable source, but as said in the edit summary, it's more like a trivia. Forbidden User (talk) 11:56, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Another sad fact of Wikipedia - the cover of the DVD, etc, are primary sources, and are usually not accepted. Meanwhile, there are lots of facts shown in the movie that I wished to include - before reading

WP:OR, anyway.) I'm not reverting it myself, as it'd look like edit warring. Welcome to continue here.Forbidden User (talk) 12:03, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Jerry and the Goldfish

How the hell was my edit vandalizm? I was fixing the grammar. There's no need to keep mentioning Tom and Jerry's name four or five times all in one sentence. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 08:42, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

Hi. Please have a look at the message I've just posted at

Talk:BBC Two '1991–2001' idents#Time for a clean up and perhaps reconsider your revert! Thanks,  —SMALLJIM  11:27, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

I don't know why you posted a message at

BBC Two '1991–2001' idents would be appreciated.  —SMALLJIM  11:47, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Following our short interchange on my talk page, can I have a response now, please? It was clearly not vandalism as you first claimed, and the only other argument you have offered is a form of

WP:ILIKEIT, which is not valid either. I want to carry on with this clean-up of the article, so I will revert you unless you can provide a policy/guideline-based argument. I'll be happy to engage in discussion at the article's talk page, of course.  —SMALLJIM  08:49, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Since you haven't replied, I've assumed that your

silence implies consent, and am redoing the removal of unreferenced content.  —SMALLJIM  12:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Your edits to the list of Horrible Histories episodes

Hi there! I appreciate your interest in the accuracy of each sketch description, that's great. As it happens, I have about as encyclopedic a knowledge of each sketch as anyone does who isn't directly connected to the production (long story, which involves running an episode review blog), and I've gone over the article accordingly--but there's always going to be something missed somewhere, and I appreciate any and all help filling in the gaps.

Thing is, though, changes made simply for the sake of making them don't usually add much, and often devalue the whole. In particular... do I really have to explain why it's a bad idea to include that line re: Caligula's right hand? The reader doesn't need to know that to get the sense of the sketch (Caligula talks to a lot of inanimate things over the course of his sketches; it's a silly comic flourish, not an aspect of the real-life character) and as I mentioned it's open to really awkward misinterpretation--adding 'literal' in there just makes it worse. Again, thanks for the help, Shoebox2 talk 12:36, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

List of Disney's Fantasia characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Ellis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:29, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ten Pieces, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dan Starkey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hot Cross Bunny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Joe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantis character list proposal

I am calling a proposal to start an article regarding a list of all the characters who were featured in the BBC series Atlantis. If anyone in favor of this, let me know. Visokor (talk) 18:52, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Messages left at User talk:DBigXray

FYI - DBigXRay has not edited Wikipedia since July 2014 and might not be reading your messages. Also, List of The Land Before Time characters is not protected, any editor is able to remove vandalism from it. If you are seeing vandalism in Wikipedia articles, unless the article has a severe level of editing protection, most editors are usually able to remove it themselves. Shearonink (talk) 17:45, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Still in Love with You (Electro Velvet song)

Hi Visokor. Sorry that your thread was unilaterally closed as "off topic", without you having a further reply. Wes Mouse is right, of course, the question was a bit off-topic. He's also right about the "American vibe" of the song. But I don't think he's right about the accent. I'd say that both singers sing that song in East coast American accents. To my ears the only "RP" accent that I can hear in the song is Larke's interjection "Oh yes!" And I think Wes Mouse is also wrong to suggest that their speaking accents have any connection with their singing accents, although again, to my ears, Larke sounds just as south-east England as Nicholas. But these are just my opinions. The use of the American accent has been so ubiquitous in British pop music, that's it hardly surprising no commentators saw it as noteworthy in this song. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:00, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Horrible Histories (2015 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francis II. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Horrible Histories (2015 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles I. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

Pingu (series 1)

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Pingu (series 1) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pingu (series 1) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Launchballer 21:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pop cultural references

Hi Visokor, though I appreciate your enthusiasm, resubmitting this content is not appropriate. For starters, as you know, per

MOS:TV, Meaning of pop cultural references should also not be included if they are not supported by citations of reliable secondary sources. Anyhow, it's nothing personal, but the content doesn't belong in the article until it can be sourced. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:15, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ten Pieces, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carmen Suite. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help at

List of Professor Layton Characters

needed

Hello, I noticed you had edited

List of Professor Layton Characters. The list was considered for deletion mainly because it had no sources. The request was dropped by the nominator after I promised to clean it up. However some help is needed with the sourcing. The basic characterizations might be simple to source with game reviews and such which might on the off-hand describe the character. Not the best of sources but good enough. Would you be kind of enough to at least look? --Mr. Magoo (talk) 19:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ali Baba Bunny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Open sesame. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tom and Jerry

I don't know the shorts well enough to patrol the articles' plot summaries, but you certainly can. Trivialist (talk) 20:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jackanory-2006.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Visokor. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to [email protected].

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1. ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
2. ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or [email protected]. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Next Great Magician

Hello, Visokor. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The Next Great Magician, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Spartaz ^Humbug! 10:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

April 2017 - Recent Edit

Hi. This is to let you know that your edit to The Lego Batman Movie has been reverted. Although it's appreciated that you were correcting the edit of an IP User, the fact of the matter is that the movie, even if it is set after the events of The Lego Movie, is a spin-off of that movie, and should be stated as such in the Lead for this article. Your edit, and those of another and the IP User, were reverted back to the version by Oshwah, as a result.GUtt01 (talk) 21:40, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gex (video game)

I suggest that you carefully read

WP:CV to understand the copyright policies of Wikipedia. Do not readd the violating content; Wikipedia takes a dim view on copyright violations, even if it comes in the form of reinstating offending edits. AtomCrusher (talk) 22:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Continued copyright violations

I notice you have continued to upload copyrighted content from other sources, namely plot descriptions for

The Pink Panther (1993 TV series)

despite multiple previous warnings over time. As a result, I have created an ANI notice to alert administrators to this fact.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. AtomCrusher (talk) 18:39, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pingu (series 1)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion

. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Shirt58 (talk) 03:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

July 2017

Hi. This is to let you know that your recent edit to The Lego Batman Movie, was reverted, due to the material that you added in being unsourced. While it can be noted you were being helpful with your edit, such material should have included a citation to back it up. Please take care to ensure you properly provide citations for new information on this and any other article you edit, in future. GUtt01 (talk) 13:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saturday Mash-Up!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swap Shop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Visokor. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OutsidersB&BS1.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List from characters of Monsters vs. Aliens listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List from characters of Monsters vs. Aliens. Since you had some involvement with the List from characters of Monsters vs. Aliens redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:03, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Visokor. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New message from DBigXray

Hello, Visokor. You have new messages at Talk:The_13_Ghosts_of_Scooby-Doo#Recent_edits_and_reverts.
Message added 17:15, 25 April 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DBigXrayᗙ 17:15, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Cyphoidbomb

Hello, Visokor. You have new messages at Talk:The_13_Ghosts_of_Scooby-Doo#Recent_edits_and_reverts.
Message added 23:13, 28 April 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi there, though you are not required to respond to the discussion above, it would be nice to know that you understand some of the other issues I raised, like about tone, contractions and parentheticals. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:13, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

WP:UNSOURCED

"All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." You did not meet this burden. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:19, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see

WP:RELIABLE. Inserting unreliable resources does not overcome the problem of unsourced articles. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:43, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Again, please see

WT:ANIMATION. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop. There is nothing good that is going to come of you reverting back to unsourced, non-notable original research. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:11, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(

WP:AFD and let the community handle the notability issue. Please do not edit war to restore the redirect. regards. --DBigXrayᗙ 11:44, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

DBigXray, I don't think the article should be deleted: I think it's a perfectly valid redirect. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:40, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wacky Races (1968 TV series)

Hey, Are you finished writing episode plots yet?

New message from DBigXray

Hello, Visokor. You have new messages at DBigXray's talk page.
Message added 10:04, 22 September 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

DBigXrayᗙ 10:04, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from DBigXray

Hello, Visokor. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Animation#Lots_of_unsourced,_non-notable_articles.
Message added 11:40, 22 September 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DBigXrayᗙ 11:40, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Visokor, this thread has been updated with ways of dealing with what you call "extinction". Please check it once more. Remember edit warring is not an option here. Repeated edit warring may lead to blocks. --DBigXrayᗙ 06:27, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your good work in helping to improve and maintain our cartoon related articles. DBigXrayᗙ 18:01, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Supermarket Sweep (British game show), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit

Hello, Visokor. Thank you for your contribution to the page

WP:V. Thank you. Stefvanschie (talk) 08:46, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Crash Bandicoot characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hybrid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PPG Reboot

Why do you keep reverting edits that truthfully claim that the PPG reboot is over? The show's ratings were so abysmal towards the end (during the 3rd season) that it would be insane to even begin production on a 4th season. And the pandemic is not a good excuse for saying the series is still ongoing, because it's very possible that production on the show ended well before the pandemic, and new episodes for other shows are still airing, as far as I know. However, to avoid edit warring, I've decided not to intervene and revert your edits just yet, nor do I plan to anytime in the near future. For now, I'll just wait and see what happens next. Classicalfan626 (talk) 12:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeff Wayne's Musical Version of The War of the Worlds – The New Generation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Universal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

February 2022

Hello, I'm Slenderman7676. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rolling stock of the Keighley & Worth Valley Railway‎, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Slender (talk) 13:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Moon Knight (TV series) are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. They are not for general discussion about the article topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Centcom08 (talk) 10:18, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

June 2022

Hello, I'm Centcom08. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Spider-Man: No Way Home, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Centcom08 (talk) 09:02, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ms. Marvel (TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Centcom08 (talk) 09:10, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

here. Nightscream (talk) 21:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hanna-Barbera's Christmas Sing-A-Long moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. FishandChipper 🐟🍟 07:57, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hanna-Barbera's Christmas Sing-A-Long! (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Discogs is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hanna-Barbera's Christmas Sing-A-Long! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Visokor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hanna-Barbera's Christmas Sing-A-Long! (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blaze Wolf were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Discogs is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hanna-Barbera's Christmas Sing-A-Long! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hanna-Barbera's Christmas Sing-A-Long! (December 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Amazon and Spotify are not independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hanna-Barbera's Christmas Sing-A-Long! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:21, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2023!

Hello Visokor, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2023. Happy editing, Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 21:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

May 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pokémon Scarlet and Violet. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:43, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pokémon Scarlet and Violet: The Hidden Treasure of Area Zero for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pokémon Scarlet and Violet: The Hidden Treasure of Area Zero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémon Scarlet and Violet: The Hidden Treasure of Area Zero until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 22:47, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Secret Invasion (TV series), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gamowebbed (talk) 09:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, I'm Facu-el Millo. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —El Millo (talk) 17:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Visokor reported by User:Gamowebbed (Result: ). Thank you. Gamowebbed (talk) 09:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Block appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Visokor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 10.80.1.6. I don't know what's happened, but there must be some mistake here... Visokor (talk) 13:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That is not your Internet address. You can find your Internet address using a tool such as WhatIsMyIPAddress. Note in almost all cases, requests like this come from people who are using a proxy (or at least, an IP address serving as a proxy), so please be very sure before following up. Yamla (talk) 13:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do I need to disconnect from my network or something to check if that was the problem? I wasn't doing anything wrong, as far as I'm concerned. Visokor (talk) 14:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please try now. It looks to have been a bug on the wikimedia side. --Yamla (talk) 14:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Must've been. disconnected internet and reconnected. no block message when I click on "Edit" Visokor (talk) 14:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hanna-Barbera's Christmas Sing-A-Long!

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 17:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

September 2023

how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection

.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

It appears that you have already been warned for edit warring in the past, so your continued behavior smells of

WP:IDHT; in addition, edit summaries like this aren't helpful. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 11:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Your draft article, Draft:Hanna-Barbera's Christmas Sing-A-Long!

Hello, Visokor. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hanna-Barbera's Christmas Sing-A-Long!

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

WP:QUO. Take it to the talk page if you have an issue. Armegon (talk) 23:23, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Unsourced editing

I feel like I've seen your edits be undone on the grounds of failing to add a

verify what you're adding a number of times on Sonic articles in the last week or so. Are you understanding the issue here? If you need help understanding, I can try to explain. But if you just keep adding content without adding a source, you're going to end up getting your account blocked from editing temporarily. Sergecross73 msg me 18:56, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

December 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Wrong Trousers, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 18:03, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Visokor, I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary (only 15% of your edits have a summary which is appallingly low for an experienced editor). Just as concerning, on some occasions your edit summary is you shouting at other editors in capital letters. Please try to always fill in the summary field with a brief and civil summary of your edits. This helps your fellow editors and explaining your edits can also help you to avoid disputes. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:08, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm Trailblazer101. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Madame Web (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Trailblazer101 (talk) 07:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning - unsourced editing

Hello Visokor. After seeing this unsourced edit you made, I reviewed your talk page and saw at least 8 separate warnings about not using sources. And you haven't stopped or addressed a single one of them.

This is your final warning - if you add/change Wikipedia without providing a source that verifies it again, you will temporarily be blocked from editing. You need to be following

WP:REFB. Sergecross73 msg me 18:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Visokor. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{

ygm}} template.

TheDireMasterchat 11:15, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]