Talk:Hasty Pudding Theatricals

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts. Theatre Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

So first off, shouldn't the lists be under the parent header? Secondly, wouldn't they be better consolidated into a table? Ashre (talk) 06:38, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All right, to avoid getting into a revert war here: Why does someone keep adding a list of all the Pudding presidents, producers, etc., since 1992? This information is of little consequence and no interest to the typical reader; it clutters up the article, and is just a list of redlinked names of people the reader has never heard of and who have apparently no other notable achievements. Will anyone defend their inclusion? AJD 19:14, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Having seen no defense of their inclusion in a month, I'm removing the lists again. AJD 21:07, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems the list really doesn't add anything to the article, the names of the productions do nothing really to inform about the productions at all, nor the organization. And really adds unnecessary bloat to the article. 96.31.177.52 (talk) 21:10, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]