Talk:History of engraving

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Duplication?

I note that Engraving#History points readers to Old master print and Line engraving. -- John of Reading (talk) 16:26, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, indeed it is duplication. This very poor quality effort is an unhelpful translation from the Spanish that we really don't need. Perhaps it should be redirected or disamed. Johnbod (talk) 04:50, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A particular problem is that the majority of the article is not about
WP:CFORK bits that can't be usefully added anywhere just dropped. Another problem is that this is paid editing. The article entirely ignores Anglophone printmaking throughout, and I suspect the Spanish version is actually translated from the French, as there is a huge emphasis on French and German work. Johnbod (talk) 16:36, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Unless anyone objects, I am going to start dismembering and dispersing this soon, along the lines I mention above. Johnbod (talk) 01:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Log - opening size 268,383 bytes. Johnbod (talk) 18:32, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To European printmaking in the 20th century, 67k bytes removed
To Ambroise Vollard - c. 10k bytes copied, most left in European printmaking in the 20th century for now.
to European printmaking in the 18th century - 27,915
to European printmaking in the 19th century - 65,072
to Woodblock printing in Japan 1,875
to Woodblock printing (China) 3,800
Size now 99,600

Johnbod (talk) 23:06, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For now I'll just redirect to Old master print. Johnbod (talk) 01:06, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]