Talk:Hoedads Reforestation Cooperative

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconEnvironment Low‑importance
WikiProject icon
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
project's importance scale
.
WikiProject iconFirefighting
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconSociology
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"Hoedad" or "hoedag"?

Hoedad, Kaibab National Forest

Apparently there is a variety of viewpoints on the name of the tool. On Wikipedia,

Hoedad (tool)? Would be great to add some images of the tool to this article, as well, such as those at Hoedads Online. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 14:10, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

I left a note on your talk page about this as well, but Hartzell's book cited in the further readings section notes that the name of the tool used was (at least originally) referred to by these work crews as a "hoedag." It appears that over time the name of the tool probably became a "hoedad" given the use by the Hoedads co-op. I can do some further research into this over the weekend once I've got my copy of the book at my disposal again. Anarchivist | (talk) 16:30, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi, Anarchivist, Thanks for your notes there & here. I appreciate your thoughtfulness on this. It would be great to understand the full variety of names and uses (and by whom) for this tool, perhaps starting a new,
    Hoedad (tool) or Hoedag (tool) article, with illustrations. Since there are at least two different sources, with two different understandings of the term and its origins, we'll need additional perspectives, too. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 16:41, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • I have located a copy of Hartzell's book & you're right -- it does have a nice paragraph or so on the history of the tool, which he calls a 'hoedag' (p.29). He suggests that the original name for the tool was a 'skindvic hoe'. Time to stub in an article on the tool? (Or alternately, and perhaps preferably, adding a section to the Hoe (tool) article?) Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 14:21, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Stubbed in an entry on "hoedads (or hoedags)" at Hoe (tool). Further contributions there are welcome! Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 10:22, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]