Talk:Hohokam Pima National Monument

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconNational Register of Historic Places High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconIndigenous peoples of the Americas
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconProtected areas Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Arizona Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Mid-importance).

Acreage

I deleted the area number because several online sources give either 1690 or 2501 acres. No way to tell which is correct without a survey or access to current official documentation. And, frankly, since it's a secret place, I couldn't point out its boundaries on a map, though the park service seems to have placed a point to it on theirs, but it's right on the southern edge of Coolidge, and not anywhere that 4 square miles of "inaccessible" land appears to be. 24.221.121.232 03:53, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Access

When I spoke with the folks at the visitor center of Casa Grande National Monument they said that Hokoham Pima National Monument was buried (to preserve it) and will remain so indefinitely. I wish I had a better source for this but I think it would be nice to add to the article so anyone looking to visit it will know that that there is nothing to see, just a dirt field.

PureJadeKid (talk) 16:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit and cleanup

I changed the governing body to the Gila Indian Reservation, since per NPS "The Monument is located on the Gila River Indian Reservation and is under tribal ownership. The Gila River Indian Community has decided not to open the extremely sensitive area to the public. [1] --Pete Tillman (talk) 06:22, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Map pin marker

My browser shows the location to be way off, in wrong county (too far north). It shows as being in Maricopa County when it should be in Pinal County. Backspace (talk) 04:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

infobox update needed

NRHP infobox for the monument as a whole appears not appropriate, as this NM is not NRHP-listed, I believe (although Snaketown, within the NM, is NRHP-listed and has an NRHP infobox in the article). Please help compose a properly formatted geobox that covers the National Monument designation, includes an image, and so on. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Protected areas#Cleanup to use Geobox rather than NRHP infobox for many U.S. National Monument articles. doncram (talk) 23:38, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to fix the geobox -- as an interim fix, I restored the historic photo to the NHL infobox.
This is all rather academic, as the NM was created to protect Snaketown -- effectively, they are one and the same. See the name discussion in the invisible comments in the article. No public access anyway. Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 01:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hohokam Pima National Monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Snaketown

A version of the

Snaketown page was merged into this article back in 2008. In 2011, someone decided to write a more extensive treatment of Snaketown, but put it there (Snaketown) instead of here. These should be merged. Magic♪piano 17:23, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

merge I could see the potential for the national monument site to be focused on the modern-day site with the separate snaketown page being focused on the archaeology and history, but right now I think the two have sufficient overlap for them to be merged. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 17:30, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

National Register?

The article mentions that Snaketown was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1974, but this does not make sense to me. By the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, all NHLs and NPS historical units are automatically added to the NR. As it was designated an NHL in 1964, it should have been added to the NR in 1966. If for some weird reason it was not, then it would have been added in 1972, when Congress designated it a Nat'l Monument under the NPS. — Eoghanacht talk 21:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]