Talk:Holy Name of Jesus

A fact from Holy Name of Jesus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 February 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that devotions to the Western Christianity? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/February.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity Mid‑importance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Catholicism Low‑importance Holy Name of Jesus is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Catholicism task list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles Eastern Orthodoxy Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the Eastern Orthodox Church. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You may also want to look at the current collaboration of the month or the project's notice board.Eastern OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyEastern Orthodoxy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

In the anti Catholic tract "death cookie" chick makes the claim that IHS realy stands for Isis, Horus, and Set of the egyptian pantheon.: Bloodkith (talk) 22:05, 28 April 2011‎

Chick, a 20th century comic book writer "claims" something? How encyclopedic! History2007 (talk) 23:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That seems to me to be one of the clearest cases where Chick must have pretty much known he was lying (or proceeded with one-eye-closed reckless and malicious indifference to truth and falsehood). In any case, the Geneva Calvinists also embraced IHS/JHS, and there are explanations in probably more detail than you want to know about the true origin at Christogram... AnonMoos (talk) 15:58, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The scope of this article cannot be the "name of Jesus", for which see

. Its scope is clearly the specifically Roman Catholic tradition associated with the specific term of (Most) Holy Name of Jesus (Santissimo Nome di Gesù, there doesn't even seem to be a coined Latin term for it) as it developed from the 14th century or so. --]

Regarding the split tag: (1) I am regrettably unclear as to what specific portions of this particular article should be split off to the

talk) 06:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Since the split proposal, which seems a bad idea to me, has attracted no support in some 9 months, I'll remove it. Johnbod (talk) 09:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]