Talk:Hurricane Juliette (2001)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Todo

Needs more on impact, and slightly longer intro. Jdorje 20:31, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Impact pictures, inline sources. Jdorje 19:45, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I found an AMS paper talking about Juliette. It turns out that it was one of the wettest tropical cyclones in point storm total rainfall in Baja California for the past quarter century. I'll add the reference/text in the next couple days. Thegreatdr 19:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good find. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:21, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good link Hurricanehink (talk) 17:44, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Damages

If anyone is curious on how I found the damages, I found that Juliette caused $175 million dollars in damage in 2001, per this site. Though it says dollars, it means pesos, I asked my spanish friend (luckily enough I have one). After that, I converted $175 million pesos to USD using this monetary converter site. I wasn't sure of the date, so I chose late December. Then I inflated it to 2005 USD. If this is disallowed, I can remove it, but feel free to comment if necessary. Hurricanehink 19:51, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is okay for now, but ultimately we should use GDP deflation for the inflation calculation. — jdorje (talk) 20:02, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Did we agree on that (I forget)? The whole money thing is a little confusing, so until we change all of them, we should keep it as it is. Hurricanehink 20:13, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We haven't really agreed yet. But that's how it was done in the Cuba document. I agree, until we start changing all of them, we should keep it as it is. — jdorje (talk) 21:17, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Hurricanehink 21:23, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section too short

I believe that the lead section for this article is too short compared the the rest of the article. Gummycow moomilk 16:39, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]