Talk:Hypochaeris radicata

A fact from Hypochaeris radicata appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 February 2005. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that dandelions, and has similar culinary uses? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2005/February.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here . Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages. Plants Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article talk page was automatically added with {{

The article says that catsear is safe for humans but poisonous for horses. Cans someone expand on that?174.6.130.25 (talk) 16:47, 20 June 2009 (UTC)BeeCier[reply]

Are Hypochaeris radicata and Hypochoeris radicata the same plant? They seem to be, yet I don't see anything on this wiki to indicate they're synonyms. Khono (talk) 13:27, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, found my answere here. They are the same plant. Undo my edit to the article if you have evidence to the contrary, please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khono (talk • contribs) 13:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hypochaeris radicata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100923203819/http://golfandsportsturf.com.au/article.asp?ArticleID=45 to http://www.golfandsportsturf.com.au/article.asp?ArticleID=45
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6VqJ46atN?url=http://www.bsbi.org.uk/BSBIList2007.xls to http://www.bsbi.org.uk/BSBIList2007.xls
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311181041/http://www.nwcb.wa.gov/weed_info/Written_findings/Hypochaeris_radicata.html to http://www.nwcb.wa.gov/weed_info/Written_findings/Hypochaeris_radicata.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hypochaeris radicata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bsbi.org.uk/BSBIList2007.xls
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110221204206/http://www.seven.eques.com.au/health-pdf/Stringhalt.pdf to http://www.seven.eques.com.au/health-pdf/Stringhalt.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I took a picture of what I believe is a false dandelion for its forked stalk with multiple flowers, and identify.plantnet.org identifies it as Hypochaeris radicata whose stalk is supposed to be solid. However, when I broke a stalk, I found it to be follow. Could any false dandelion have solid stalks? --Roland (talk) 21:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]