Talk:IBM Naval Ordnance Research Calculator

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Early computers task force (assessed as High-importance). Military history: Technology / North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force North American military history task force United States military history task force

Article moved from the full name of the machine. (unsigned comment)

Should we rename this article to IBM Naval Ordnance Research Calculator? I'm not familiar with WP naming guidelines, so please don't scream at me if this is a bad idea. Waiwai933 (talk) 19:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To find WP naming guidelines, key "WP:naming" in the search box (it's often easy to locate WP helps). In the found article you'll note in the contents section 3.7.3. Clicking that, there is a brief paragraph and a link to another article with Rationale and specifics. By now, you'll be a Wikipedia expert. Good luck. tooold (talk)

Thanks for the information. However, I'm still not sure about this article itself, since most people probably haven't even heard of NORC, let alone have a preference of which style to use. Waiwai933 (talk) 20:26, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]