Talk:Identity Thief

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Comedy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

I'm confused. The infobox says the film has made somewhere between $34 and $35 million (I don't remember the exact number), while the "Box office" section says that it's made around $36 million. I'm guessing the infobox number is correct, but does the other one need to be fixed? Alphius (talk) 23:17, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The guy that wrote that bit of the page should really stop using reflexive pronouns (ie We) and stop foreshadowing like in a regular article. Right now it's a terrible read.

Almost the entire reception section is not necessary. It's practically just talking about people responding to some review of the movie not about actual reviews of the movie. It needs to be completely rewritten. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.80.8.4 (talk) 02:14, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There's no need for rewriting exactly but I do agree the section needs to be expanded to include more actual reviews. For a film with predominantly negative reviews it gives

WP:UNDUE weight to list 1 positive review (and to list it first), and only 1 negative review (and a whole lot of response that one negative review). I will try to expand the reception section to give a more detailed explanation of the different ways in which critics thought the film was bad. -- 109.78.201.245 (talk) 23:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

I read a whole lot of reviews and added a few more to the article. Most directed their ire at the script, they nearly all say good things about McCarthy (even if her style is not to everyone's taste), but plenty of the reviews say some very unpleasant things about the grotesque character and she plays. -- 109.78.201.245 (talk) 00:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have significantly improved the section now. It has a wide range of reviews addressing various aspects of the film, and the paragraph about the Rex Reid review includes responses from Rex Reid and McCarthy. -- 109.79.177.91 (talk) 06:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Robert king got his identity stolen from javi or his dad in 2006 in hawaii and jokester my husband Jose Gomez herenandez ying Lou stole Brooke eakle kings identity scammed her poisoned her stole everything she owned and they were both tormented by dr and everyone on mtv for 4 years 174.240.235.89 (talk) 22:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stole the name Jesus cause of Jose Gomez herenandez is living in pana il with mtv crew in campers across the st 800 3rd st pana il 174.240.235.89 (talk) 22:47, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]