This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
I'm having some trouble here with research, searching on THOMAS with the strain 'Methamphetamine precursor control act' the only bill I find is a house bill which seems to have only been introduced and referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security back in 2005. There was however a bill with the short title of 'methamphetamine precursor control act' passed in Illinois which classified pseudoephedrine etc. as schedule V drugs, which was passed in the state senate with the number 273. That would seem to indicate that this article is confused as to the nature of the Act, it not in fact being at the federal level but at the state level. There are similar laws in other states which restrict the sale of methamphetamine precursors.
The Controlled Substances Act article uses similar wording and also suggests that the MPCA was federal, which is why I'm hesitant to change this. (PsychoSmith 03:22, 11 January 2007 (UTC))[reply]
Most likely the article was confused with the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005. This is Illinois state law. Thanks for clearing this up. Ishmael Rufus 14:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Requested move
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 06:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since
Wikipedia's naming conventions
.
Support as nominator. Hippo (talk) 16:45, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.