Talk:Indohyus

Mammals Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why was the family page moved to the page for a single genus within that family? This has been turned into such a mess that I'm not sure what the standard practice is for fixing it. Basically, the history of Raoellidae should probably be preserved there, then the article as it currently stands (pertaining only to Indohyus) should be moved here. I guess one of the two has to have a cut and paste job at this point. Which should it be? --Aranae (talk) 12:55, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, I really have no idea how to retain the proper history in a situation like thta. I have therefore cpied a historical version of this page over at Raoellidae. --Aranae (talk) 22:11, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Indohyus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071220115757/http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/12/indohyus.php to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/12/indohyus.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071220115725/http://scienceblogs.com/loom/2007/12/19/whales_from_so_humble_a_beginn.php to http://scienceblogs.com/loom/2007/12/19/whales_from_so_humble_a_beginn.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:24, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing a bio. I know him. Give me til Dec 31 2018 --Akrasia25 (talk) 13:17, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Akrashia25:, please remember to start new threads at the bottom of the talk page, and it is unnecessary to spam all talk pages with the same message.--Mr Fink (talk) 13:31, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, Completed bio

Things have moved on and we have so much evidence that archeo cetaceans came from Artiodactyls but this is not a POV. Just think we should add this paragraph to many other articles if we keep it here. Thoughts?Akrasia25 (talk) 20:52, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]