Talk:Interstate 80 Business (West Wendover, Nevada–Wendover, Utah)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good article nominee
Listed
November 26, 2008WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
December 10, 2010WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
January 17, 2011Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article
WikiProject iconGuild of Copy Editors
WikiProject iconThis article was copy edited by Diannaa, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on December 18, 2010.

Assessment

The route description is a single sentence and needs to be expanded before this article should merit consideration for B-class. --

talk) 16:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

BL-80

I have emailed UDOT, and am waiting for a response, but I can find no legal source that states that this is also BL-80. Yes, there are pictures and fan websites, etc, but as far as Utah Code and from what I can find on UDOTs website, I can find no legal definition.

I also emailed NDOT, because I was going to create a combined Wendover Blvd BL-80 article for both states, but I could not find a legal source stating it was a BL, and they said they cant even find the paperwork that would have needed to be sent to get the definition. As far as Nevada state law is concerned, Wendover Blvd between the state line and Alt-93 is just Local collector route #3003. They are attempting to contact

AASHTO, but they aren't getting anywhere fast. --Admrb♉ltz (tclog) 15:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

GA Review

This review is
Talk:Interstate 80 Business (West Wendover, NV–Wendover, UT)/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
here
for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    A few minor prose issues. I'll go do a quick copy edit to clear them up here.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to
    reliable sources): c (OR
    ):
    I would like to see photographer/author credits for the photos added to the references, but this is a minor detail.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy
    .
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have
    suitable captions
    )
    :
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Barring the very minor prose issues which would be easier for me to fix than to list here, the article is very good. I rate it as a pass. Imzadi1979 (talk) 01:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 January 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (

talk) 19:38, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]


WP:USSH, the guideline for naming business routes such as this one, is "Interstate X Business (City, State)". However, the guideline doesn’t mention what to do if the route covers more than one city and state, such as this route. As such, I think "Interstate 80 Business (Wendover Boulevard)" would make a better title for this page. 24.228.135.248 (talk) 19:26, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
talk page or in a move review
. No further edits should be made to this section.

Route color

Does anyone think that this route should be highlighted in green? Cause that seems to be the color that a lot of Interstate Business routes are. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 05:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The standard practice across Wikipedia (not just road articles) is if a highlighted object in a map is used to illustrate location, to use the color red. If two colors are required, typically the secondary color is blue. I'm not sure how that came to be, nor if it is formally codified or just tradition. However, it's fairly standardized across Wikipedia. Regardless, Green is not a safe color choice to highlight objects on a map, given red-green colorblindness is the most common type and almost all maps already use red for lines in the map.Dave (talk) 17:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]