Talk:Jacen Tan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Former good article nomineeJacen Tan was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 12, 2009Articles for deletionKept
September 7, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee


GA Review

This review is
transcluded from Talk:Jacen Tan/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I shall be reviewing this page against the

Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Quick fail criteria assessment

  1. The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
  2. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
  3. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
  4. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
  5. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.

No problems found when checking against quick fail criteria, on to substantive review. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    • The article is reasonably well written
    b (MoS):
    • Would suggest a suitable infobox is added, and that the background section be expanded to give some account of his life. A section of reception / criticism of his films would be good as well. Any reliable sources in the additional sources section should eb converted to inline citations tied to the statements they support;
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    • ref #12 [1] is a dead link; includes cameos by prominent Singapore film-makers such as Juan Foo, Tan Pin Pin, Sun Koh, Kristin Saw and Lionel Chok. only two of these are supported by ref #3 [2]; ref #6 [3] supports the fact that the film won 2nd place in the Digital Short Film - Open Category, not overall at the fiesta ss implied; ref #10 [4] is OK, but makes no connection with the film; neither does ref #15 [5] which as a press release is a
      WP:primary source
      .
    b (citations to
    reliable sources
    )
    :
    c (OR):
    • The connection made between Tan's film and the availability of sports pitches appears to be
      original research
  3. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects):
    • No details about birth, upbringing, eduction - the sort of details that should be included in a biography.
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy
    .
    Fair representation without bias:
    • Insufficient content to determine
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have
    fair use rationales
    )
    :
    b (appropriate use with
    suitable captions
    )
    :
    • Not applicable no images used.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    • Overall, this article is a long way away from good article standards so I will not be listing it at this time. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:16, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 22:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]