Talk:Jai Bhim Comrade

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 7, 2014. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Anand Patwardhan documentary Jai Bhim Comrade, released in 2011, took 14 years to produce?

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Awards / Documentary / Festivals / Indian This article is supported by the Film awards task force. This article is supported by the Documentary films task force. This article is supported by the Film festivals task force. This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force. India: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

There should be some explanation of the title; what does "Jai Bhim" mean? Languagehat (talk) 15:00, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@

@Fylindfotberserk: The source in this case isn't dependent on the website, which is merely hosting it. Sight&Sound seems reliable enough; it would be a valid source even without the url. Unless we have reason to believe the website is fabricating the whole thing, therefore, I'd say it's not a problem. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:42, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vanamonde93, I agree, but the blog ness of the source and the fact that the real source is just an image made me tag it with a "better source needed". Let's see what Cyphoidbomb says. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:48, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk: I agree with Vanamonde93 here. I'd use {{cite journal}} and ascribe the info to Sight&Sound, written by Mark Cousins. I tried to find an archive of this magazine but was unsuccessful. Sometimes you get lucky at Google's Newspape Archives. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:04, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: Thanks for the input. Should I remove the "Better source needed" tag? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:09, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]