Talk:Jazz FM (UK)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Major objection to deletion
There is a potential problem here, jazzfm.com is not just a website but also a
- The Jazz FM website is also the third top link provided on a google search for "jazz" --tgheretford (talk) 09:15, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Hopefully the point raised in the prod tag should now have been resolved. I have had to move the page back to Jazzfm.com from Jazz FM (website), because the station name is jazzfm.com (see WP:NAME). --tgheretford (talk) 18:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC)]
- Hopefully the point raised in the prod tag should now have been resolved. I have had to move the page back to Jazzfm.com from Jazz FM (website), because the station name is jazzfm.com (see
September relaunch - title of article
With confirmation that the station will relaunch in September on a number of DAB multiplexes and on digital satellite television, I propose in accordance with relevant guidelines at
Okay, make that October 6th... still, any better article title suggestions? --tgheretford (talk) 08:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
I have come up with two ideas which override what I wrote above:
- Move the current Jazz FM page to Jazz FM (disambiguation). Then move jazzfm.com to Jazz FM on October 6th (because it will be the most appropriate primary topic as per WP:DISAM) and add the following to the top of the page:
- This would be the ideal solution, but if that is too long by consensus, we could use the following as a compromise:
- As I wrote originally, keep everything as it is but rename jazzfm.com as Jazz FM (UK digital radio station).
I would now favour option 1. Anyone suggest anything better? --tgheretford (talk) 21:14, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Just in case anyone reads this, another editor elsewhere suggested "Jazz FM (UK)", which I agree with (why do I never think of the obvious ones?). --tgheretford (talk) 13:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081003125413/http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/smoothfmformat/consultation.pdf to http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/smoothfmformat/consultation.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090320054928/http://www.thelocalradiocompany.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/final-rf63770_p05_cln.pdf to http://www.thelocalradiocompany.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/final-rf63770_p05_cln.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jazz FM (UK). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718183128/http://www.radiotoday.co.uk/news.php?extend.3106.2 to http://www.radiotoday.co.uk/news.php?extend.3106.2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Jazz FM (UK). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090131011337/http://frequencyfinder.org.uk/old_updates_dig.html to http://frequencyfinder.org.uk/old_updates_dig.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.citywire.co.uk/professional/-/news/other/content.aspx?ID=214143&Page=4 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930041750/http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radio/ifi/rbl/rbupdates/update0807/ to http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radio/ifi/rbl/rbupdates/update0807/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130510070916/http://www.crainsmanchesterbusiness.co.uk/ to http://www.crainsmanchesterbusiness.co.uk/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20080228%2FFREE%2F556837529%2F1109%2F-%2F-%2Fgmg-jazzes-up-digital-radio
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 23 November 2017 (UTC)