Talk:Jeffery Taubenberger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconViruses Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

I think the story of Johan Hultin is more interesting and more credit should be given him towards the discovery and re-sequencing of the 1918 virus.

Seems all the guts & glory have gone to this guy...

Juergen S. Philippines: I am study in Virology H1N1 so if you get any Information about Spanish Flu please let me know ! Thank you very much!

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jeffery Taubenberger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:17, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion in the text

Hi guys,

I'm not sure who's actually responsible for this, but the following section doesn't make sense to me: "The genome of the flu virus includes about 13,000 base pairs, which had decayed into pieces as small as 100 base pairs. In order to make PCR work, primers have to be constructed, i.e. a short bit of DNA with mirror sequences of the sequence at the two end points of the fragment. They bind to the fragment, and with the help of a polymerase bases are added between the primers to make a copy. The millions of copies of the gene segment are labelled with a radioactive probe as they are being made. They can then be separated on a thin gel by running an electric current across the gel. The radioactive labels create a black mark on an X-ray film which is put over the gel."

So whilst PCR (polymerase chain reaction) effectively fills in the gap between the two primers, it doesn't actually work like that. It's DNA replication, therefore each strand is extended from one of the two primers. As for labelling with a radioactive probe...kind of, that method of sequencing isn't used any more, but the technique is still valid. It's basically termination sequencing where each fragment terminates in a radioactive isotope, so in practice with lots of fragments of varying length you can read the sequence. BUT this is separate from PCR! It follows on from that, to sequence the fragment.

Hope this makes sense

Tim — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.48.60.6 (talk) 12:40, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Stephen Carter and Dr Leonard Crane

Hello. I apologize for making an unsolicted edit, which was a question, if Dr. Carter had been the author of stranger than fiction. I was looking for the book mentioned and stumbled upon another person named Dr. Crane. Since my edit may have been wrong, since it was taken back almost immediately, I wanted to ask, if changes are taken back because of formatting, or because of further knowledge and other sources. And if there is a source regarding Dr. Carter being the real author, to give some reference. Thanks! 46.223.196.184 (talk) 21:26, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]