Talk:Jeremiah 31

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bible High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity High‑importance High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Judaism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of New Covenant was copied or moved into Jeremiah 31 with this edit on 20:27, 13 March 2019. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Personally I would prefer to see the table of contents on the left after the lede, rather than on the right below the infobox, where it seems to be hidden away. Any thoughts? BobKilcoyne (talk) 22:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@BobKilcoyne: It is also my preference to put TOC on the left, but in this case the page looks bad with much empty space. I was trying some options and the tocright seems to be the best at this moment. I don't plan to implement it to many articles until a satisfying solution is found. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 23:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bible is intrinsically obscurantist, and wikipedia articles on the Bible are also obscurantist, as in this case where the Table of Contents has been hidden where we don't expect to find it. Vagabond nanoda (talk) 06:49, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The "New Covenant" section contains copied content from New Covenant; see that page's history for attribution. JohnThorne (talk) 22:24, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some content in the Parashot section was copied from Parashah with modification after verifying the information. JohnThorne (talk) 23:03, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]