Talk:Jersey Railway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

pictures

We have been using this picture on the Hohlgangsanlage tunnels, Jersey page, thought it might help but I wasn't sure if this was the right railway so posted it here first.

This rail tunnel formed the entrance to Ho5

(Fdsdh1 (talk) 02:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

This is the correct railway tunnel. The line dug a tunnel in the late 1890's/early 1910's (don't have the material on hand but can look this up later) at this site. The tunnel was used by the Germans, and both 3ft and 1metre gauge tracks still remain in the tunnel to this day. TechnicalOtter (talk) 10:06, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Point of gauge conversion

One wonders what possible advantage it could have been to change the gauge of the Jersey railway?

Tabletop (talk) 11:16, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean what the Germans did its because they used 60cm gauge (in their tunnels) and 100cm gauge everywhere else so they could use their own trains rather than having to modify existing designs (Fdsdh1 (talk) 02:20, 31 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jersey Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]