Talk:John Henry Johnson

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance). College football Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. National Football League Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Canadian football Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canadian football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canadian football and the Canadian Football League on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Canadian footballWikipedia:WikiProject Canadian footballTemplate:WikiProject Canadian footballCanadian football articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. inactive .Pittsburgh SteelersWikipedia:WikiProject Pittsburgh SteelersTemplate:WikiProject Pittsburgh SteelersPittsburgh Steelers articles

San Francisco 49ers Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Francisco 49ers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the San Francisco 49ers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.San Francisco 49ersWikipedia:WikiProject San Francisco 49ersTemplate:WikiProject San Francisco 49ersSan Francisco 49ers articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject San Francisco 49ers To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : Tag appropriate talk pages with {{WikiProject San Francisco 49ers}} and update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed San Francisco 49ers articles and Category:Unknown-importance San Francisco 49ers articles. Photo : Update photo of starting quarterback Brock Purdy showing him in 49er gear for his article and inclusion on this page. (Requires photo upload and link to Wikimedia Commons.) Other : Expand active membership. Bring Good article . Update articles on current 49er personnel.

This review is

transcluded from Talk:John Henry Johnson/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BlackJack (talk · contribs) 12:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review

I'll do this one. Will start soon. Jack | ^{talk page} 12:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@BlackJack: Pardon my discourtesy, but will you be reviewing soon? Lizard (talk) 16:02, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lizard the Wizard:No problem, Lizard. I did intend to do this sooner rather than later but I've been busy elsewhere. Leave it with me. Thanks. Jack | ^{talk page} 16:27, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No big deal, take your time. Lizard (talk) 16:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full review criteria checks

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B.

   embedded lists

   :

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable with no original research?

   A. Has an

   appropriate reference section

   :

   B. Inline citations to reliable sources where necessary (e.g., direct quotations):

   C. No original research:

   D.

   No copyright violations

   :

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Scope:

   B. Length:

4. Is it
   neutral
   ?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are

   copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content

   :

   B. Images are provided if possible and are

   suitable captions

   :

Well, this one is as good as it can get. It's a well-written, interesting and throroughly sourced article that fully deserves GA status so I'm passing it without any requests for improvement as, if I had any, I would be guilty of pedantic nitpicking. It is a very good article indeed about a man who was a long-term top-class player. Well done. Jack | ^{talk page} 20:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]