Talk:Käre bröder, så låtom oss supa i frid

	Käre bröder, så låtom oss supa i frid has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result April 30, 2022 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Classical music Sweden Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

GA toolbox
Copyvio detector Authorship External links
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Käre bröder, så låtom oss supa i frid/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will start this today and might finish in time! --K. Peake 09:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:26, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

• Change the writing date to simply 1770 since only dates/months should be noted next to years

Hmm. Done.

• Cello is not sourced anywhere in the body

Removed.

• Only one full-stop should be used at the end of the subtitle sentence, as this can act as closing punctuation when part of a title

Done.

• Dancing and the gospel parts are unsourced

Edited.

• "Its approach is" → "The composition's approach is"

Done.

• Any more commentary to add here from reception/legacy?

Done.

Background

• First para looks good!

Noted.

• Wikilink drinking songs

Done.

Song

Music and verse form

• Add relevant text to the audio sample

Added.

• "to be written." → "to be wrote." so the prose is less repetitive

Edited.

• "It has the timbre" → "The composition has the timbre"

Done.

• "each of fourteen lines." → "each consisting of 14 lines." per
  MOS:NUM

Done.

Lyrics

• Only pipe to Solen glimmar blank och trind once on the img text

Hm, the image is a graphical index from the places to the epistles; and it's used in multiple epistle articles. If you're down at 17, Lilla Sjötullen, and you're faced with an unlinked "Ep. 48" and no other clues, that's pretty unhelpful. The links are small and not very conspicuous – they have to be small or the caption would spread far down the article – so we can't give the reader an index and then leave them hanging, arguing there's a link somewhere at the other end of the index! Therefore, I'd say the small amount of overlinking is necessary and justified.

• Prose looks good!

Thanks!

Reception and legacy

• "soon after the real watchmaker Jean Fredman's death" → "soon after the real Fredman's death" per this character already having been introduced in the body

Done.

• Should you use "was intentionally" or "is intentionally" per the correct tense?

Changed.

• Pipe to Conversion of Paul the Apostle should only be on dramatic conversation

Done.

• "he wrote this first epistle he" → "he wrote his first epistle he"

The "this" seems entirely apposite here, the point is that it was this epistle, the subject of this article, that set the ball rolling. In another article we'd name it differently.

• "another eighty of them:" → "another 80 of them:" per MOS:NUM

MOS:NUM says "Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words.

Integers greater than nine expressible in one or two words may be expressed either in numerals or in words (16 or sixteen, 84 or eighty-four, 200 or two hundred). When written as words, numbers from 21 to 99 are hyphenated (including when part of a larger number): fifty-six or fifty-six thousand but five hundred or five thousand." This doesn't ask for writing these as numerals. Looking at the matter again, words for quantities of epistles are preferable to avoid confusion with epistle No. NN, so let's go for words, per MOS.

• "but it was the start of" → "but marked was the start of"

Edited.

• "more modern Swedish would have" → "more modern Swedish would have used"

Edited.

• Last para looks good!

Thanks.

• Pipe to Conversion of Paul the Apostle should only be on dramatic conversation for the img text

Done.

References

• Copyvio score looks fantastic at 7.4%!!!

Thanks!

• WP:OVERLINK
  of Bellman Society on ref 14

Done.

• Pipe Polydor to Polydor Records on ref 15

Done.

Sources

• Good

External links

• Good

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; nice job again! --K. Peake 20:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• ✓ Pass now, I briefly copyedited reception and legacy, also I understand the areas where you did not implement my suggestions! --K. Peake 07:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]