A fact from Kőbánya cellar system appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 September 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the cellar system(pictured) under the Kőbánya district of Budapest, Hungary, has served as a limestone quarry, a beer cellar, an aircraft engine factory, and a bicycle race venue?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
The lead section is a mess. The first paragraph is way to long (the text after "While intricate ..." should be separated in a new paragraph or better yet, deleted. There are too many citations for the reading to be smooth.
. Ok, corrected. The lead section is now in two neat paragraphs.
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline
(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions subtitle of the image (Anton Dreher Sr. (id. Dréher Antal)) should be changed to something more informative, like "Anton Dreher Sr., austrian brewer, first wine brewer in the Cellar" Mdob (talk) 19:45, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Ok. Corrected. Mdob (talk) 19:13, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Mdob and Rev-san: Hello! What is the status of this review? Doesn't look like any progress has been made in almost 2 months.--Dom497 (talk) 01:33, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Mdob and Dom497: I have fixed the article as good as I could. I hope it gets GA status. Good luck with further work on Wikipedia! --Rev L. Snowfox (talk) 17:34, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]