Talk:KMEG

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Stations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance). South Dakota Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Iowa This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Iowa (assessed as Low-importance).

I edited one of the paragraphs so that it is more neutral. It needs sources though. I suppose corporate publications would suffice, so if someone were to do a bit of reasearch, that would be greatly appreciated. --HappyCamper 20:13, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed this image here - I doubt this television station really has the word "Wikipedia" spaced out in the background. The insertion of this image by the sole author KMEG makes me wonder whether this article is factual or not. Hence, I've added the totally disputed tag at the top for now. --HappyCamper 02:26, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the image again here...I really don't think that picture would be an approved and proper rendition of KMEGs logo... --HappyCamper 05:07, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you have any questions about KMEG on Wikipedia, you can contact the KMEG employee at mailto:[email protected] Thanks! Moved this section/note from the main article to here. JHunterJ 18:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks JHunterJ. Hmm...well, there is contact information for KMEG here: http://www.kmeg14.com/contact - I'll probably try those first if we need additional materials for the article. Historical information would be quite useful... --HappyCamper 00:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems there was a comment made in the article page. I'll post it here instead. --HappyCamper 00:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline

is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:KMEG.PNG

fair use

.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline

is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KMEG. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]