Talk:Kallawaya language

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Languages This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. inactive .Endangered languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Endangered languagesTemplate:WikiProject Endangered languagesEndangered languages articles

Indigenous peoples of the Americas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Bolivia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bolivia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all Bolivia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoliviaWikipedia:WikiProject BoliviaTemplate:WikiProject BoliviaBolivia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I saw the show and it looks like the abracadabra of a few charletans. Is there no notable citable scepticism about this "language"? Am I alone in this?Chrisrus (talk) 07:31, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please watch the show about this "language" linked to in the article. After doing so, it is my prediction that it will become very obvious to you that this is nothing more than a bunch of witchdoctors pretending to have a secret magic language.

This is not a real language.

If, after watching it, this becomes your point of view as well, please suggest ways we could improve this article in light of these facts. Not only is there no real proof that this "language" exists, and that the evidence is instead consistant with it being a hoax perpetrated on the customers of a bunch of magic-word-chanting, llama-foetus-waving, magic potion salesmen. Chrisrus (talk) 13:24, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081121013020/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/awards_festivals/fest_reviews/article_display.jsp?&rid=10471 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/awards_festivals/fest_reviews/article_display.jsp?&rid=10471

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

I have just modified 2 external links on Kallawaya language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929224417/http://www.livingtongues.org/kallawaya.html to http://www.livingtongues.org/kallawaya.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070912143258/http://www.itsmarc.com/crs/lang0135.htm to http://www.itsmarc.com/crs/lang0135.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:34, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]