Talk:Kandivli

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Maharashtra / Mumbai Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Mumbai (assessed as High-importance). This article was last assessed in September 2008. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Trains Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the Mahavir Nagar (Kandivali) page were merged into Kandivli on 14 November 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Mumbai may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Given that the list of schools is pretty irrelevant to the topic and moreover may probably not be exhaustive, I think it does not need to be included. Pranav K (talk) 05:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus to delete. Deletion debate is archived below. -- Cecropia 01:29, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)

• Substub that I found on a random page search. - Lucky 6.9 05:57, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. BTW the "contribute" link above directs to the Main Page. Exploding Boy 13:45, Apr 19, 2004 (UTC)
• Definitely keep. If this were a substub about an American place it would not even appear here.
  Graham  :) | Talk
  01:12, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Comment: I didn't choose this out of American sentiment. I chose it because it was a substub, nothing more. If this can be expanded, I say keep. Or, why not merge it into the article it points to? - Lucky 6.9 02:38, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Cribcage 05:37, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)

I added a link for the Stone Age claim. I didn't know that Kandivali was inhabited in the Stone Age, but a Google search revealed that it probably was. So added the external link. -Gajamukhu

I have noticed that a few landmarks are given wrong like the Kala Hanuman Temple is on M.G.Road and not off it. Also the content regarding the Charkop metro line along with its reference is outdated and hence needs updation. I would like to do the same if everyone is fine with it. --Gaurav.jhala88 (talk) 07:41, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]