Talk:Karanvir Bohra

	Karanvir Bohra was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result September 8, 2014 Articles for deletion Kept October 16, 2015 Good article nominee Not listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance). India: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

needs to be looked upon and removed

I think almost all of the unnecessary trivia has been removed now. Regards,

Rishika.dhanawade (talk) 2:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

I actually agree with some of the removals of content by User:Hollywoodbollywood22 aka User:Durr-e-shehwar. In particular:

• The various roles Bohra was "approached" for but did not take (or did not get). That provides no encyclopedic information on Bohra, and this source doesn't just get Bohra playing the role wrong, but also his supposed co-stars Matt Damon and Dev Patel - it can only be considered rumormongering years before the film was shot.
• The "in the media" section consists solely of irrelevant trivia. We're not a celebrity gossip rag, and the quotes in that section are excessive.

If no good reason is presented why that content improves the encyclopedia, I'll remove those parts again. Huon (talk) 16:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As it happens I agree, and he made the fair point that this article did not (to him anyway) get treated the same way as others in the category (e.g his comment on my TP here)- but as I said then, it wasn't his edits, it was the

^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

I agree, so i removed some content. please see my edits. Jimmy Aneja (talk) 11:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@

The user Digvijay is being a pain, this user is removing stuff from other pages, but when it comes to this page he/she gets angryDon 03:53, 17 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turehnde (talk • contribs)

I've removed what is clearly promotional nonsense from this article, for instance stuff that was resubmitted in this edit. The journalist Purva Desai, in 2013, described Bohra as "stylish, hot and confident". in real life, Bohra is the hero who is working towards a better and clean environment" These statements only serve to promote the subject. I am having difficulty thinking of another article that includes character evaluations the way we'd include a critic's summary for a film. Doesn't belong here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:51, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please can the non fiction and fiction shows be clubed together under one table CutiePieAkky (talk) 06:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: I mean, it does seem to make sense that they are split. Is there a reason to put them in one table? --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 16:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Karanvir Bohra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131021114031/http://www.indiantelevisionacademy.com/site/awards_hhita_details_new.php?year=2012 to http://www.indiantelevisionacademy.com/site/awards_hhita_details_new.php?year=2012

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:06, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Karanvir Bohra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121028030742/http://www.media247.co.uk/bizasia/indian-telly-awards-2012-winners to http://www.media247.co.uk/bizasia/indian-telly-awards-2012-winners

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]