Talk:Kathleen Culhane Lathbury

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Women scientists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Pharmacology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Chemgirl13.

Above undated message substituted from

Great Job! You did a good job of explaining her scientific career. You also did a good job of shedding light on the inequality between mean and women scientists in a way that does not show bias. (Belles18 (talk) 03:59, 1 October 2016 (UTC))[reply]

This was a really well written article! Very informative! Chemgirl13 (talk) 16:55, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the previous user--such a complete article! You've done some great research thus far. Ebridg01 (talk) 01:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great job. A well-written article. I would consider adding some pictures or other figures of her and/or her work if you are able to find them. --Jellybean913 (talk) 22:54, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]