Talk:Kazaam

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Comedy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. California: Los Angeles Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance). New York City Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Quotes section seems to exist solely for it's sexual innuendo... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.41.41.6 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, but it is all in the movie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.93.25.4 (talk • contribs) 02:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if it's a problem, but the plot sections here and at IMDb are identical word-for-word right now. Coanda-1910 (talk) 10:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kazam is not Kasaam. Kazam is a UK mobile phone company. Kazaam is a movie

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kazam&redirect=no This is a redirect from a misspelling or typographical error.................... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Borgward (talk • contribs) 22:31, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I solely placed the title “Kazaam” due to me speaking of the actual movie. Not a cell phone company :-) JamaicanCoop2010 (talk) 14:45, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kazaam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120421023850/http://www.gq.com/sports/profiles/201204/shaquille-oneal-interview-nba-tnt-commentator-best-basketball-players to http://www.gq.com/sports/profiles/201204/shaquille-oneal-interview-nba-tnt-commentator-best-basketball-players

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So many people of a certain age misremember this movie as being called Shazam starring Sinbad. -- 109.78.201.245 (talk) 22:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Statesman article on Shazaam/Kazaam and the Mandela Effect -- 109.78.201.245 (talk) 22:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is touched on in the

Mandela effect article. I'm not sure it warrants inclusion in this article, do you think it does? Voyaging^talk 07:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

I wasn't sure it was notable enough, but someone else added it and I've cleaned it up a bit. I'd like to keep it. -- 109.79.168.179 (talk) 01:11, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to fix it if I find time, but this really needs to be fixed. 161.51.79.106 (talk) 10:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]