Talk:Kohn Pedersen Fox
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
My concerns - there are no sources listed. No external articles from anywhere else supporting the statements in the article. PEsays (talk) 4:44, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
article change.
I reverted that a little hastily, but if you want to change the article at least keep the references to their major projects. And try to tone down the cheerleading. Jasongetsdown 19:02, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
will try and wikify and create some good structure out of the one piece drabble.--Visik 08:08, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kohn Pedersen Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100320004036/http://www.kpf.com/ to http://www.kpf.com/.
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930161202/http://www.related.com/destinations/HudsonYards/ to http://www.related.com/destinations/HudsonYards/.
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
No history?
A first section called "Recent work" is highly unusual. Syced (talk) 07:09, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- I agree this could be seen as promotional formatting. I am going to switch the section so History shows up first. Please discuss here if you think this is an ill advised change. PubHobbyst (talk) 15:25, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Excessive Images of Buildings
Is it okay for this page to have this many images? I understand they're an architecture firm, but this almost seems excessive. I have not come across many architecture Wikipedia pages so maybe I'm just not aware of the norm on a page like this. PubHobbyst (talk) 15:23, 1 September 2021 (UTC)