Talk:Labour Contract Law of the People's Republic of China

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. China High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Actually, they have similar ideals, but don't have the same content. Also, the 2008 ECL takes precedence over the labor law.-->In my opinion, they should thus remain separate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.231.71.15 (talk) 02:50, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Struck an entire section full of non-encyclopaedic writing that looked entirely like editorialising and was not up to par with Wikipedia standards. I have left intact the rest of the article, despite being completely unsourced, and added the necessary citation needed tags. The article is completely lacking in substantive information on the real content of the law, which should be the primary focus, and not an afterthought compared to the unverified effects of the law outlined within. Matsuzuma (talk) 09:49, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Labour Contract Law of the People's Republic of China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111006063406/http://en.cnci.gov.cn/Law/LawDetails.aspx?ID=6079&p=1 to http://en.cnci.gov.cn/Law/LawDetails.aspx?ID=6079&p=1
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130415072639/http://www.ldht.org/ to http://www.ldht.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:47, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]