Talk:Lampriformes

original opinion

I removed the phrase "then "opah-shaped" would be a more meaningful translation" because it sounds like original research (a personal opinion) and was not referenced. The phrase should be restored, if there is a reference in the literature. Nick Beeson (talk) 13:25, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not to disparage, but, it sounds like the person who wrote that phrase is unaware that many orders are named after the type genus irregardless of whether or not the type genus is typical of the order.--Mr Fink (talk) 14:19, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lampriformes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723131237/http://strata.ummp.lsa.umich.edu/jack/showgenera.php?taxon=611&rank=class to http://strata.ummp.lsa.umich.edu/jack/showgenera.php?taxon=611&rank=class

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]