Talk:Legislature XII of Italy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Composition in the infobox

talk) 23:18, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

I don’t see anything of obvious. The page about the current legislature is about a current event, while we are speaking about history. And it is obvious that the relevant historical composition, which justifies the government, the leaderships, the presidencies of the houses, is the initial one.--Barlafus (talk) 23:40, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, the infobox is kept up-to-date with the latest composition. That's the most logical thing to do, and by the way it was the standard before you decided by yourself that it was not ok. I ask other users like
talk) 05:52, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Your “logic” is funny. I don’t say the final composition of a legislature is irrelevant, but it is obviously less important than the initial composition. Other users must give you thousand of sources, you can speak
ex cathedra and everybody must obey you. Your words are de jure the consensus? I don’t think so. --Barlafus (talk) 22:20, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
I do not agree with you, and since you came in second, you should find
talk) 00:21, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Parliamentary group vs electoral list

talk) 23:21, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Ritchie, the sources can be wrong. You must know the basics of an argument, if you want to write about it in an encyclopedia. If you want to write about astronomy and you find a reliable source saying the sun runs around the Earth, you must immediately understand that the source is wrong. If you want to write about the Italian politics and you find a source speaking about the League in Latium in 1994 and you don’t understand that it is a wrong source, it’s better you write about astronomy and not about politics. More, if a user shows you a reliable source that demonstrates that there were no League in Latium in 1994 and you remove it twice, you makes a
WP:VANDALISM. --Barlafus (talk) 23:54, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
First of all, there are no
talk) 05:55, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Richie, I repeat, stop editing about Italian politics, you demonstrated you don’t know about it, as you don’t know anything about Italian geography... You should be immediately suspicious about a source speaking about politicians of Latium in the Northern League.... Find the error.... Do not write about things you don’t know....--Barlafus (talk) 22:39, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I must warn you that on WP it's not allowed to make
talk) 00:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
I already gave you the site of the Senate showing Lazzarini belonging to FI. If you ignore it, I must remember you that Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Removing sources is a vandalism, I warns you. --Barlafus (talk) 20:23, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In my last edits there's an attempt to compromise: keep the note you wrote about Lazzarini as a warning (with slightly different wording), but also keep official data in the table. Also, could you explain why the rest of changes in numbers (apart from Lazzarini between Lega and FI)? In your edits you also change data for the Socialist Party and Democratic Alliance. --
talk) 12:19, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Legislature_XII_of_Italy&oldid=1203541648"