This article lies in the latitude of WikiProject Piracy, a crew of scurvy editors bound to sharpen up all Wikipedia's piracy-related articles. If you want to ship with us and help improve this and other Piracy-related articles, lay aboard the project page and sign on for a berth.PiracyWikipedia:WikiProject PiracyTemplate:WikiProject PiracyPiracy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
New York Times Article
I think it would be fine to have a couple of sentences in an editorial and encyclopedic voice noting that an opinion piece in the Times drew a parallel to legislative erosions of liberties in the U.S. in the wake of 9/11. However, the bit I've just reverted, besides being very hasty work with many typos, had as its basic strategy to paste in a bunch of copyrighted material from the Times piece, without any indications of quotations. I reverted instead of reformatting, because I think the Times piece should not constitute half of an article on the Lex Gabinia. Wareh 02:46, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Lex Gabinia, the Patriot Act, of bc Rome. Only possible because of the cowardice of the population. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.105.80.92 (talk • contribs)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Lex Gabinia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ
for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck
}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Someone here quotes Lintott's articles on a lex Gabinia which concerned electoral bribery. There is also, for sure, a lex Gabinia which granted Pompey powers to fight pirates in the Mediterranean. A disambiguation page might be called for. Ifly6 (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
