Talk:Liksom en Herdinna, högtids klädd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good articleLiksom en Herdinna, högtids klädd has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 20, 2022Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 22:24, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article
review progress box
WP:CV
()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4.
free or tagged images
()
6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked
are unassessed

Haven't done one of your articles for a good amount of time, here comes a review! --K. Peake 22:24, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for taking this on, good to hear from you again. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:23, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

  • Infobox looks good!
    • Thanks!
  • Keep the composition being No. 80 here but write out and source in the body, as refs are discouraged in the lead
    • Done.
  • "The Epistle is a" → "It is a" and merge this with the above para because you don't have enough content for two
    • Done.
  • Add a sentence about the composition's reception to the lead
    • Added.
  • Remove [2] from the lead because there is no direct quote here
    • Done.

Context

  • First para looks good!
    • Thanks.
  • "during the eighteenth century." → "during the 18th century." per
    MOS:NUM
    • Done.

Song

Music and verse form

  • Audio sample looks good!
    • Noted.
  • Merge the first para with the second per the short length
    • Done.
  • Pipe rhyming pattern to Rhyme scheme
    • Done.
  • Pipe 6
    8
    time to Time signature
    • Done.

Lyrics

Reception and legacy

References

  • Copyvio score looks superb at 10.7%!!!
    • Noted.
  • Add the language parameter to ref 1
    • Done.
  • Pipe The Bellman Society to
    MOS:LINK2SECT
    • Done.
  • Should Eva Toller really be listed as an author for ref 23 when that is on her website?
    • Yes, she could be hosting guest authors there too.

Sources

External links

  • Good
    • Noted.

Final comments and verdict

  •  On hold until everything is fixed; coincidentally, you expressed gratitude around the same time I started actually reviewing! --K. Peake 09:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Chiswick Chap All good, apart from where you forgot to change the pipes for rhyming pattern and 6
    8
    . --K. Peake 09:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Pass now; I am very pleased with such a quick response! --K. Peake 09:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]