Talk:Linux-powered device

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linux High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm trying to find cites for the assertions on company stances made in the second paragraph. Please help.

Aamrod 03:38, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category is called "Linux based devices" - do you think this would be a better name for this page? Or will we rename the cat after this page? Would be nice to have the names same... Any opinions welcome.--Kozuch (talk) 20:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Shouldn't this page's (and the category's) name include a hyphen, i.e. "Linux-based devices"..? Sardanaphalus (talk) 12:49, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• • Yep, as of 2010 it is! Category:Linux based devices is now Category:Linux-based devices. -- Hegpetz (talk) 22:44, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is this page, there is the template Template:Linux_devices and there is the Category:Linux based devices. Do you think that we need them all. It seems that each of them is incomplete right now. I think haveing just the category is enough. -- þħɥʂıɕıʄʈ^ʝɘɖı 22:12, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To update re: the categories,Category:Linux based devices was automatically moved 12 April 2010 to the slightly renamed Category:Linux-based devices. To your original question, they definitely need to be fleshed out to reflect each other or merged. I think the template should merge into the category. -- Hegpetz (talk) 22:43, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Linux-powered device. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121005054446/https://plus.google.com/u/0/110023707389740934545/posts/R5YdRRyeTHM to https://plus.google.com/u/0/110023707389740934545/posts/R5YdRRyeTHM
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110823092514/http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cavp/documents/shs/shaval.htm to http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cavp/documents/shs/shaval.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050617041125/http://www.linuxdevices.com/cgi-bin/board/UltraBoard.pl to http://www.linuxdevices.com/cgi-bin/board/UltraBoard.pl

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]