Talk:Lipovans

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconBulgaria High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconRomania High‑importance
WikiProject icon
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconUkraine Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


Schismatic or heterodox?

Are Lippovans considered by the Orthodox Church to be schismatic, or heterodox, or perhaps both? (I suppose heterodox would entail schismatic, but not necessarily vice-versa.) 131.183.84.166 19:21 18 Jul 2003 (UTC)

We (Lippovans) are usually considered as schismatics by Russian Ortodox Church, but not by majority of other Ortodox churches in the world. --Shao 03:35, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
I'll add something about that. ]

Image:Lipovan monument.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded,
Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion
. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Why no changes?

The week is now half over and only two small changes have been made to this COTW. Why aren't the fifteen people who nominated it making improvements? It is bad form to vote for an article for COTW and then not do anything to improve the article. --EncycloPetey 02:28, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well how I understood COTW voters give task to users involved in COTW and that they do most of the work. Am I right? Luka Jačov 10:02, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the picture

"Lipovans" is not "old belivers" in Russian.--Nixer 11:48, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It does not imply a translation, as far as I know--Asterion talk to me 15:12, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"Lipovans (Lipoveni)" comes from "Filipovans (Filipoveti)". Filipp was a monk that initiated the sect. ]

Clean up

This article need some clean up. Lipovans exist only in Romania! They are part of the broader category of Staroveri, that can also be found in neighboring countries.

]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lipovans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Proposal

As far as I can tell this page is about the same group as the Filippians page, which is small and doesn't cite any sources. Does anyone know if they are or are not about the same group? Are the Lipovans Bespopovtsy? Thank you Alistoriv (talk) 03:24, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lipovans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]