Talk:List of Arizona ballot propositions

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles United States: Arizona Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Mid-importance).

This is a great page, I'm very encouraged to see that you took an almost identical approach to what I did with the List of Oregon ballot measures.

One thing that rose out of our discussion over there, was the usefulness of pages that can be printed in black-and-white. People discouraged me from coloring entire rows in the tables, and I think they were right. By the way, exactly what does the blue coloring indicate here?

Also, I think that some prose describing each election cycle (as I've done for 2004 and 2006, so far, in Oregon) is worthwhile. Might be better in a separate article, I don't know.

Anyway, keep up the good work! I'll check back to see if you have any more good ideas I can steal. I might grab those "checkmark" images off here, I like those.

-Pete 23:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article over at List of Oregon ballot measures is in fact where I took the inspiration for this article. I looked at some of the other ones, such as the one set up for California but found the Oregon article to be superior. Good job over there.

I did not carry over all of your columns, for example the one regarding constitutional amendments, due to the fact this is implicit in Arizona's ballot measure numbering method. Any measure numbered 1XX is for a constitutional amendment. The shading is to indicate citizen initiatives as opposed to legislative referrals. This is implicit in the 2XX measures, which are by definition citizen initiatives, but the origin of 1XX and 3XX measures is otherwise ambiguous. I'm still not sure whether I prefer the row shading method to denote this or if the addition of another column would be beneficial. The concerns about the black/white printing are valid though, and if the shading method is kept perhaps a lighter shade could be used.

Feel free to snag the checkmark things, I incorporated those after seeing them on some other yes/no lists. Some people have argued that the red=no, green=yes coloration is inherently POV, but I think it's fine as that is a fairly universally accepted convention.

Arkyan 17:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

http://www.azleg.gov/const/Arizona_Constitution.pdf p.105 of 107 this is footnote 2. i can't fix now. Romanfall (talk) 20:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)romanfall[reply]

	An image used in this article, File:Flag of Phoenix, Arizona.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot -- talk) 14:08, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Arizona ballot propositions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111227123839/http://www.azsos.gov/election/2006/info/pubpamphlet/english/Prop103.htm to http://www.azsos.gov/election/2006/Info/PubPamphlet/english/Prop103.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061214044231/http://www.azsos.gov/election/2006/Info/PubPamphlet/english/Prop207.htm to http://www.azsos.gov/election/2006/Info/PubPamphlet/english/Prop207.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Arizona ballot propositions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070209035718/http://www.iandrinstitute.org/Arizona.htm to http://www.iandrinstitute.org/Arizona.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see the propositions listed, but no 2018 results of the vote? Jusdafax (talk) 13:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]