Talk:List of The Baby-Sitters Club novels

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Children's literature Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Tasks you can do: edit history watch purge Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks. Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles. Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}} Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project. Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject . References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs. Create a requested article on literature Stubs: Improve a stub-class article edit Women writers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I think having an individual page for each book is a great idea (although it will take some time). Maybe we could come up with a standard template for each one. Maybe something like:

1. Title
2. Date published
3. Major characters involved
4. Brief synopsis
5. Expanded synopsis (That includes spoilers)

Any ideas? - Fastestdogever 04:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it would be a fascinating endeavor, though very overwhelming. I'll have to do some studying and thinking about it. It seems kind of overdone to have a page per book, yet to split it up and have one page per type (regular, mystery, super special, etc.) means some of the pages would get to be much too long. All worth some consideration, though! AffirmationChick 18:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It may be a bit too much, at least for now, to create several pages about each of the books. Besides, I think we should keep the list, as it would be helpful, and the list itself needs a TON of work. Maybe in the future, the individual pages can be created, but for now, I suggest that we work on fixing this list. --

s 22:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

This list continues to need a lot of work, because only the main books are numbered correctly for some reason. I'm not sure how to do it, though, as when I went to do it, it listed them all as "1." I'll try to find out, but if someone else knows how, it would be easier. As it stands now, this list almost looks worse than when I was in here six months ago... AffirmationChick (talk) 03:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The numbering problem may have been because of extra spaces between each entry--you can't have spaces between the entries on an automated numbered list. Propaniac (talk) 12:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]