Talk:List of World Heritage Sites in Croatia

	List of World Heritage Sites in Croatia is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on March 18, 2019.
Article milestones Date Process Result November 19, 2017 Featured list candidate Promoted

This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Croatia High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. inactive .World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles

I don't understand the

OK, I get it now thanks to the UNESCO website. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:20, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is the issue with the formatting? I don't understand why someone is eager to revert small changes in column width. And there is no "standard" for table formatting; see the following links below where the tables look different:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Heritage_Sites_in_Cyprus
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Heritage_Sites_in_Italy
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Heritage_Sites_in_Spain

So again I ask: what is so wrong with the changes made? --Jesuislafete (talk) 19:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• You did your best to find the lists that "do not" use the specific format, which is a small minority. I will eventually get to lists for Spain and Italy to unify the style. It is more compact than what you propose and more convenient for the reader, for example. --Tone 19:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, Spain has been promoted to a FL in 2010 and we should check if it still fits while Italy is not a FL. --Tone 19:51, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is assuming bad faith by User:Tone. I am surprised that you chose to accuse me rather than answering my question on the formatting. It appears to me that you are more interested in keeping your formatting than actually improving the page. You did not ever use the talk page to explain yourself. I was the one who started a discussion on the talk page.

Can you please link me a page that says that this formatting is required for World Heritage sites? --Jesuislafete (talk) 19:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is not formally required, however, these articles went through a detailed review and were considered good. The style is compact, readable, adjustable to a wide variety of screens. And since you picked European lists, you must have seen that almost all of them are using the same style. So, it is not assuming bad faith, just pointing out the obvious ;) --Tone 20:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yet you were willing to edit war over table widths rather than using the talk page. Incredible. --Jesuislafete (talk) 16:34, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]