Talk:List of World Heritage Sites in the United States

	List of World Heritage Sites in the United States is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result June 23, 2023 Featured list candidate Promoted

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. inactive .World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles

	Lists
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The Alamo and the San Antonio missions were named a World Heritage site on July 4, 2015. It should be added to the list in the article.--ML (talk) 16:07, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1466 ~ the meccaneer (talk) 18:44, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of World Heritage Sites in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170224235652/http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/409 to http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/409

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:34, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

...for the first time in NINE years. They added the Brooklyn Bridge and a bunch of Chicago skyscrapers.Arglebargle79 (talk) 01:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The 20th Century Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright is no longer tentative and has been added to the WHL. Powers ^T 12:59, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that the Description column in the table causes the table to be difficult to read, even on a desktop monitor. There are two possible ways to fix this: One way would be to remove the Description column or limit the number of words in the description since each entry has a link to the appropriate article. The other way would be to convert from a table to a bulleted list so that the descriptions can use the full page width. Indyguy (talk) 17:27, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Or would it be better to just add a section about the World Heritage Site tentative site to the California Current article? The article would ideally include all components of the tentative site including a number of protected and natural heritage areas administered by the NPS, the FWS, NOAA, etc. I'm curious about what everyone thinks. Cheers! Ligocsicnarf89 (talk) 21:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think that even if the Complex is designated as a WHS, it still shouldn't have a separate article, but California Current could be expanded or transformed to include it so as to not have duplication. The tentative site could definitely be mentioned there as part of a description of what areas off the coast have protection, but I don't see notability there for it yet. Reywas92^Talk 23:04, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]