Talk:List of architecture awards

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Awards This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

I have tried to move away from alphabetical list to give some indication of relative importance of various prizes. Obviously this is open to opinion and is currently Western-centric, so developing some ground rules might be useful for how to proceed or reorder. Some possible examples: length of history, value of prize, notability of previous winners, difficulty to achieve and so on. --stochata 23:05, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Can we combine the 'Major', and 'normal' international awards sections? The divison line seems a bit arbitrary to me, and I am not sure it is worthwhile. Thoughts? Miscreant 01:34, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good point, Miscreant, but I feel the non-specialist reader could do with some help identifying which are more important, whatever important means. I agree that the boundary between "major" and the rest has to be fuzzy. However, some are clear cut: for example, the winning the

Emporis Skyscraper Award

is certainly not in the same league. I also see that the division is against some Wikipedia philosophy: letting the reader make their own mind up about the importance of one or another award. How easy is this, though, if the list is long (I know it is not long yet!), and includes blogger X's award? Perhaps some information by each might help, but again, how does it help where the award is simply held in high esteem among architects?

• • Year first awarded
  • Awarding body
  • The recognition of the awarding body (e.g., the national institution, or not)
  • Prize money

--stochata 15:51, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721002713/http://www.architectmagazine.com/awards/pa-awards/Default.aspx to http://www.architectmagazine.com/awards/pa-awards/Default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.a4le.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=4280
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150626101125/http://cintasfoundation.org/index.php/fellowships/architecture-fellowship to http://cintasfoundation.org/index.php/fellowships/architecture-fellowship
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101025045944/http://www.raic.org/honours_and_awards/awards_firm/index_e.htm to http://www.raic.org/honours_and_awards/awards_firm/index_e.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101026040443/http://www.raic.org/honours_and_awards/awards_urban/2010recipients/index_e.htm to http://www.raic.org/honours_and_awards/awards_urban/2010recipients/index_e.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101027145132/http://www.raic.org/honours_and_awards/awards_xxe/tor_e.htm to http://www.raic.org/honours_and_awards/awards_xxe/tor_e.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101025045649/http://www.raic.org/honours_and_awards/awards_young/index_e.htm to http://www.raic.org/honours_and_awards/awards_young/index_e.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]