Talk:List of major archbishops of the Syro-Malabar Church

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think for better results the SM election process of the head of the Church must be modelled on the Papal election proceedures which contribute to a considered well thought out use of one's vote. Prof. G M Kunjethy (talk) 15:35, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Other persons on list

@

WP:3RR. Consult here and get consensus because at present two editors disagree. ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:09, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Seeing no other support for including names other than the major archbishops, I'll be reverting the page to only be a list of their names. Let me know if this is opposed. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article contains the same thing twice

@Asukite, Mako001, Czello, and Lettherebedarklight: Hello there! It seems most, if not all of this page was duplicated, so the page essentially contained the same text twice - there might be small differences between the upper version and the lower version though. It seems that the IP you have been reverting was trying to fix this mistake. I just wanted to let you all know, because there seems to be a big misunderstanding. Additionally, someone should probably look at the two versions of this page (that at the top and that at the bottom of the duplicated original) and reconcile any differences and content lost by deleting one version. Toadspike (talk) 14:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I didn't realize. It was the edit summary that made me question the edits, I should have looked closer. I messaged the IP editor as well. ASUKITE 14:30, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Asukite, Toadspike, and Czello: et. al.: a discussion regarding the initial disruptive nature of this IP editor is open here. Comment, input, and consensus there and in the discussion above this one are greatly appreciated. ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Election of SM Major Archbishop. I have the impression that the election of the head of the Church is not conducted with sufficient seriousness or circumspection. It would be fine to follow the different steps and processes of the Papal Elections to assure a more considered and suitable outcome.

SM election of Major Archbishop must follow proceedures of Papal Elections. Kunjethy (talk) 15:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]