Talk:Local law in Alsace-Moselle

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. France Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Does the French Government allocate a pseudo-ISO-3166-2 code for Alsace-Moselle in the same way as the UK Government allocates EAW for England and Wales, or is that a silly question? -- Alan Peakall 16:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No because Alsace-Moselle doesn't designate an official region. Please see ref. 1.

Papatt (talk) 22:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The only way is to consider the 3 ISO code : FR-57 ; FR-67 and FR-68 to group this 'entity' --Kisscool57 (talk) 19:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is a link on this page to

Exactly, as explained on fr:Concordat en Alsace-Moselle#Ministres du culte. I fix it. Papatt (talk) 22:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Richard asr (talk) 11:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Local law in Alsace-Moselle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071024032216/http://www.idl-am.org/bj_contenu.asp?DocumentID=12 to http://www.idl-am.org/bj_contenu.asp?DocumentID=12

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]