Talk:Lok Shakti

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance). India: Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as High-importance).

Was the Lok Shakti daily newspaper published by Lok Shakti, the political organization? There's mention of this newsletter as part of Shankar Dattatraya Javdekar's article but I don't know if the two Lok Shakti are related to the point that we can add a section about the newsletter to this article and to x-wikilink with Javdekar's article. --Marc Kupper|talk 19:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lok Shakti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041026005253/http://frontlineonnet.com/fl1520/15200380.htm to http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl1520/15200380.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:57, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]