Talk:Lunar orbit

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spaceflight Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Astronomy: Moon / Solar System Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Moon task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

'lunar orbit insertion' redirects here but there are no numbers. Lunar Orbit Insertion says only that "... free-return trajectory to the Moon ... is a rather high energy path, which necessitates a very large (~1,000 m/s or 3,000 fps) maneuver to achieve [elliptical] orbit insertion," followed by a circularisation burn. - Rod57 (talk) 11:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On Stackexchange someone wrote "From an Earth-Moon Hohmann transfer, it takes about 680 m/s to reach a low lunar orbit at ~100 km altitude." "The Apollo missions started from a faster transfer orbit, so they required a little more ∆v; Apollo 11's initial LOI burn was 889 m/s to enter a 113 km pericynthion, 313.4 km apocynthion orbit." - Rod57 (talk) 11:41, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

selenostationary orbital distance for any tidally locked moon Arlo James Barnes 10:20, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]