Talk:Luton DART

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airport project.

project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	The infobox box status of this article has been marked as: Complete

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in the following regions may be able to help:
Bedfordshire	London	Hertfordshire

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Controversies?

neutrality. As it stands, the only points covered in this section are a delay to the project, and criticism that DART is a bit too expensive. These issues hardly constitute "protracted public disputes" and do not merit a separate section. I suggest they be merged back into the history section. Cnbrb (talk) 19:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I think it makes sense for delays to be in the "history" section. Perhaps the ticket price discussion could be included in a new section under "Operation"? Garuda3 (talk) 19:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable. I think that's where they were before. Cnbrb (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]