Talk:Mac and Katie Kissoon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Fair use rationale for Image:M&K Kissoon Album.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Separate articles?

I think that although Mac and Katie might have begun their careers together, that perhaps they need separate articles, particularly because Katie Kissoon went on to do so many different tours with notable musicians that did not apply to Mac. While this is a stub, or start article, I think we should agree on one or the other now, before it's too hard to untangle. Any opinions? --Leahtwosaints (talk) 07:48, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mac Kissoon has also and continues to do alot of projects . He has been prolific in studio work and also stage work not just Katie . However the fame they achieved together as a main act is far more widely known than their roles as supporting artists and musicians . Just include here more about their other work if required . By the way their version of Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep preceeded Middle of The Road - it is wrong to say that the song had already been a hit in Europe for MOR . Mac and Katies version was a big hit in the USA also where MOR was not . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.226.191.101 (talk) 11:19, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously they were not really born in 1978

Was the infobox incorrectly copied from elsewhere? It's obvious they are not 31 years old, and I have doubts as to whether they're associated with the acts that the infobox claims. Kansan (talk) 23:46, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]