Talk:MailOnline

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Websites: Computing Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing. Journalism Mid‑importance United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150905103217/http://tktk.gawker.com/my-year-ripping-off-the-web-with-the-daily-mail-online-1689453286 to http://tktk.gawker.com/my-year-ripping-off-the-web-with-the-daily-mail-online-1689453286

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:42, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing Can anyone explain the following line:

Martin Clarke, editor of MailOnline, said, "We will soon be introducing features that will allow us to link easily and prominently to other sites when further recognition of source material is needed."[53] However, by July 2013, MailOnline articles, including main articles, still did not contain any links to original sources or tips.[54]

Sinmaz, Emine (24 July 2013). "MailOnline article showing no links". MailOnline. Retrieved 25 July 2013.

The article cited - about an orca/ killer whale - does not have any links. What links should it show? Unless anybody can explain, it looks like the Mail has bought some photographs from a photographer and used them in a story. Is there any evidence that the pictures have featured elsewhere? Certainly the pictures do not appear to have been used anywhere else. This article, on that basis, would be the original source, so there is no need for it to link to anywhere else. So this does not illustrate the point at all, and I suggest it should be removed. Perhaps there are other illustrations of the phenomenon, but this one does not work.Booklung (talk) 15:49, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, the bullet points should be moved to before the types on the 'Types' section at the beginning of the article as in my opinion it would make the article look more professional. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 09:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Mail Online logo.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:22, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]